Tuesday, October 7, 2008
 
 
News
2008 News Items
   
 
 
2002 News Articles
Sidak Study Analyzes the Benefits of Allowing Bidders to Opt Out of Their Winning Bids from the Nextwave Reauction
   
Supreme Court Quotes Sidak in Verizon Communications v. Federal Communications Commission Decision
   
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit quotes Crandall in United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission decision
   
Crandall Analyzes Costs of "Voluntary" Carbon-Dioxide Suppression
   
Crandall and Jackson Publish Study on Economic Benefit of Broadband Technology
 
 

Supreme Court quotes Sidak in Verizon Communications v. Federal Communications Commission decision

In May 2002, the Supreme Court upheld federal regulations aimed at forcing local telephone companies to share their networks with rivals at regulated prices. In a 7 to 1 decision, the court ruled against Verizon Communications Inc. and other incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs). The ILECs had argued that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) illegally required them to lease their networks to competitors at artificially low rates.

The Supreme Court reaffirmed the FCC's authority to write the access rules as it sees fit. The FCC sets access rates on the hypothetical costs that a competitor would incur building a new phone network using the best technology currently available--not not on the historical costs that the Bells incurred in actually building their systems, which are estimated to be much higher.

The court cited Criterion president and CEO J. Gregory Sidak to support the proposition that opportunity cost is a forward-looking cost measure.

Download Decision